A comparison with context

Compare Hyperliquid bots

Put fee conditions, account permissions, and service warnings alongside each other. Select up to three profiles; keep the evidence limits in view.

Service changes to know about

Provider announcements do not confirm current service status or successful shutdown execution. Onboarding remains suspended. Evaluated October 3, 2026 UTC; each profile carries its recheck deadline.

All 8 profiles are listed alphabetically. Source review does not establish current operation or tested behavior. Browse individual profiles →

Compare all profiles

Read each fee model and permission description in its own scope. A lower provider percentage does not establish lower total cost.

Bot profile comparison by attribute; source claims and evidence limits
AttributeBloom BotGainiumgoodcryptoXHyperbotHyperEVM Sniper BotHypurr Fun BotKatoshi AIWunderTrading
Service and listing status

Source reviewed; trading tests not run.

Source reviewed; trading tests not run.

Status information only; the provider announced a service end date. Current service status is unconfirmed and onboarding is suspended.

Status information only; the provider announced a trading wind-down. Current service status is unconfirmed and onboarding is suspended.

New-user onboarding is suspended until the evidence is reverified.

Not reverified: prior fee, dual-layer, 150 ms latency, and API-only permission claims are suspended pending accessible primary evidence.

Source reviewed; trading tests not run.

Source reviewed; trading tests not run.

Source reviewed; trading tests not run.

Provider fees and conditions

1% standard buy/sell fee.

Referral docs describe 10% cashback, claimable after the minimum (1 HYPE on HyperEVM); a separate fee page labels 0.9% for referrals. Execution-time treatment is unclear.

Fee source ↗

Free User builder fees: 0.07% on USDC spot sells; 0.045% on both sides of USDC futures trades.

Free User bots do not consume credits. Paid User mode removes the builder fee but consumes plan credits. Hyperliquid venue fees are additional.

Fee source ↗

Historical builder fees: 0.1% perps, 1% spot sells and 0% spot buys, before eligible discounts.

Hyperliquid venue fees are separate; no separate Hyperliquid subscription documented. Historical fee documentation rechecked October 3, 2026; onboarding remains withheld.

Fee source ↗

Not applicable to new recommendations

No new trading onboarding; consult the dated service-status notice for the provider's announced wind-down dates.

Fee source ↗

Not reverified as of 2026-09-28; the previous 1% claim is withdrawn pending primary evidence.

Not reverified; no accessible current primary fee schedule was found in the scoped check.

1% on trades through Hpump Market only.

The fee page does not establish rates for HyperCore spot/perpetuals or HyperEVM spot.

Fee source ↗

Published schedule: Wood 0.06% perps / 0.6% spot sells; Diamond 0.01% / 0.1%.

Diamond requires >$25M rolling 30-day volume. Vault bots use 1 credit per bot per day (1 credit = 1 USDC), with 0% Katoshi perps fee per docs. Hyperliquid venue fees are separate.

Fee source ↗

Vendor-published 0.035% builder fee per trade.

Includes Premium features with no separate Hyperliquid subscription. Hyperliquid publishes separate venue fees; WunderTrading calls its fee the only cost, but the combined in-app cost/display was not tested.

Fee source ↗
Account and key permissions

Bloom's EVM wallet guide describes creating or importing wallets and saving the private key. The documentation checked does not establish server-side key handling, signing flow, or wallet permission limits.

Web3 connection: Gainium says private keys stay in the user's wallet. API connection: the user enters a Hyperliquid agent-wallet private key, not the main-wallet key; Gainium says agent wallets can trade but cannot withdraw. The checked docs do not specify Gainium's storage and handling of the API-wallet key.

goodcryptoX says its Hyperliquid API wallet can place orders but cannot withdraw. Its setup asks users to enter the API wallet private key and says it is saved in the service's secure storage. HypeChain did not inspect the storage controls.

Historical wallet permissions not reverified in this service-status check.

Prior claims that keys are generated locally and that access is API-only with no withdrawal capability could not be reverified from accessible primary documentation. Key generation, storage, and permissions remain unresolved.

Private Key mode is documented with full functionality including transfers and Arbitrum bridge-out; API Key mode is documented for spot/perpetual trading; Read-Only is view-only. The checked docs do not explain service-side storage of imported private keys.

The source review checked pricing documentation only. HypeChain did not verify API-wallet permissions, key storage, or withdrawal access.

WunderTrading says Hyperliquid API or agent wallets can trade without withdrawal permission. Its reviewed page does not establish key-storage details. HypeChain did not test the connection or inspect key handling.

Markets and environment

BSC, Ethereum, Base, HyperEVM, Monad.

Hyperliquid.

Hyperliquid exchange integration is distinct from HyperEVM deployment.

Hyperliquid.

Hyperliquid exchange integration is distinct from HyperEVM deployment.

Hyperliquid.

Hyperliquid exchange integration is distinct from HyperEVM deployment.

HyperEVM.

Hyperliquid, HyperEVM.

Hyperliquid exchange integration is distinct from HyperEVM deployment.

Hyperliquid.

Hyperliquid exchange integration is distinct from HyperEVM deployment.

Hyperliquid.

Hyperliquid exchange integration is distinct from HyperEVM deployment.

Interfaces

Telegram, Web, Chrome Extension

Web

Web, Android, iOS

Web, Mobile App, Telegram

Not reverified

Telegram

Web

Web

Key limitations
  • The fee page lists 0.9% through referrals, while the referral page describes claimable cashback; execution-time treatment is unclear
  • The HyperEVM cashback claim minimum is 1 HYPE
  • Official wallet docs do not establish service-side key handling or permission limits
  • Free User builder fees apply only when the fee currency is USDC
  • Paid User mode removes Gainium's builder fee but consumes plan credits
  • Changing modes requires reconnecting and stops bots/cancels deals on the connection
  • The checked docs do not specify Gainium's storage and handling of API-wallet keys
  • Provider announces October 9, 2026 app and built-in-wallet access end; November 8 wind-down support does not extend app access.
  • The provider says subscription expiry does not stop existing bots. Stopping bots does not guarantee exchange orders or positions are closed; verify the exchange account separately.
  • Built-in EVM assets are held in a smart-contract wallet; exporting its signer key does not automatically display those assets in MetaMask, according to the notice.
  • Transition credit depends on snapshot eligibility and a combined 2,000-day cap per WunderTrading account; individual eligibility and benefit delivery are unverified.
  • Vendor docs say the Hyperliquid API-wallet private key is submitted to and stored by goodcryptoX.
  • Builder fees are separate from venue fees; a 0% spot-buy builder fee does not mean zero trading costs.
  • CertiK records a 2024 pentest with acknowledged and partially resolved findings; current software coverage is unconfirmed.
  • Announced September 30 exit and October 1 trading-end dates have passed; shutdown execution unconfirmed.
  • Deadline timezone unspecified; current account exit and continued analytics not tested.
  • Hyperliquid API-wallet signers are distinct from the master or subaccount holding account data; check each actual account's orders, positions and spot balances separately.
  • Do not rely on the earlier 1% fee claim
  • Dual-layer and CoreWriter claims are not reverified
  • 150 ms latency claim is not reverified
  • Key custody and withdrawal permissions are not reverified
  • Current service availability was not verified
  • The documented 1% fee applies to Hpump Market trades only
  • The fee page checked does not establish rates for HyperCore or HyperEVM markets
  • Private Key mode includes transfers and bridging out; permissions differ by wallet mode
  • Official docs do not explain service-side storage of imported private keys
  • Diamond pricing is qualified by more than $25 million in rolling 30-day volume.
  • Katoshi says spot fees apply to sells; buys are listed at 0%.
  • The documentation does not clearly explain how its fee rates combine with the Hyperliquid venue schedule.
  • API-wallet permissions, key storage, and trading behavior were not assessed in this source update.
  • The 0.035% builder fee is a per-trade charge; no separate Hyperliquid subscription is listed.
  • Hyperliquid separately documents venue fee and builder-code rules; HypeChain did not verify the combined fill cost through WunderTrading.
  • WunderTrading's page describes withdrawal-disabled API or agent wallets but does not establish key-storage handling.
  • HypeChain did not run trading tests in the September 2026 source update.
Evidence scope

Source checked 2026-09-28.

Official fee, cashback, and wallet documentation checked; trading tests not run.

Primary sources (3)

Source checked 2026-09-28.

Official Hyperliquid fee modes and wallet connection docs checked; trading tests not run.

Primary sources (2)

Source checked 2026-10-03.

Wind-down notice, builder fees, API-wallet connection/storage docs and CertiK public record checked October 3. Account exit, trading, recovery and shutdown execution not tested.

Primary sources (6)

Source checked 2026-10-03.

Official wind-down notice and Hyperliquid account, signer, order and balance documentation checked October 3; shutdown execution, account exit and analytics not tested.

Primary sources (5)

Source checked 2026-09-28.

Accessible listed bot entrypoint and official-source search checked for fees, architecture, latency, and wallet permissions; current claims not reverified; trading tests not run.

Source checked 2026-09-28.

Official Hpump fee and wallet-mode docs checked; trading tests not run.

Primary sources (2)

Source checked 2026-09-28.

Official Katoshi fee tiers, spot-side treatment, and vault-credit terms, plus Hyperliquid venue-fee and builder-code rules; custody and trading tests not assessed.

Primary sources (4)

Source checked 2026-09-28.

Official Hyperliquid bot, builder-fee, and API-wallet permission claims; trading tests and key-storage review not run.

Primary sources (4)
Next stepRead the source review →

Bloom Bot provider link (affiliate) ↗

Read the source review →

Gainium provider link (affiliate) ↗

Read status information →Read status information →Read status information →Read the source review →

Hypurr Fun Bot provider link (affiliate) ↗

Read the source review →

Katoshi AI provider link ↗

Read the source review →

WunderTrading provider link (affiliate) ↗

Provider links may include affiliate referrals. HypeChain may earn a commission; it does not affect listing order. A documentation check is not a recommendation or safety certification.

Read the shared service notices for provider-announced lifecycle dates, the latest recorded checks, and their review deadlines. goodcryptoX and Hyperbot remain status and transition listings; onboarding is suspended. Earlier fee and security analysis is historical context, and shutdown execution has not been tested.

How to read this comparison

Source review: September 28, 2026. Documentation review is not a trading test. No new execution, withdrawal, profitability, or latency results are claimed here. Hyperbot is retained for transition information and HyperEVM Sniper Bot has no active endorsement or onboarding link.

Provider charges are separate from exchange fees, funding, gas, and slippage where applicable. Discounts require eligibility; rebates may require a later claim. Different markets and paid plans are not directly comparable by a single percentage.

Read each profile for permissions and primary sources. A non-custodial label does not mean the provider stores no delegated trading key. An audit or pentest applies to its stated scope and date, not every subsequent integration.

See the September correction baseline and review methodology . Affiliate links may earn us a commission.

Source check: September 28, 2026. Documentation review; independently tested behavior is not established by this check.

Scope: September 28 provider-fee, selected permission, and auditor-documentation comparison baseline. Lifecycle checks have separate dates in the shared notices; trading, withdrawals, and latency were not tested.

Sources reviewed (4) & freshness policy

Evaluated October 3, 2026 against the 90-day editorial window. This describes a dated source check, not current service operation. Builds do not renew it.