Hyperliquid Trading Bots: Fees, Permissions & Status
Source check: September 28, 2026. Documentation review; independently tested behavior is not established by this check.
Scope: September 28 pricing, selected permissions, auditor records, and service-notice correction baseline; trading, withdrawal, and latency tests not run.
Sources reviewed (5) & freshness policy
Evaluated October 3, 2026 against the 90-day editorial window. This describes a dated source check, not current service operation. Builds do not renew it.
Service changes to know about
- goodcryptoX: app and built-in wallet access end date announced for . Status & exit information · Provider notice ↗. Source checked 2026-10-03.
- Hyperbot: trading and copy-trading end date announced for . User exit deadline: September 30, 2026. Status & exit information · Provider notice ↗. Source checked 2026-10-03.
Provider announcements do not confirm current service status or successful shutdown execution. Onboarding remains suspended. Evaluated October 3, 2026 UTC; each profile carries its recheck deadline.
Start with service status
Hyperbot is a status and transition listing . Read the shared service notice above for its provider-announced dates and the limits of the latest check. Onboarding remains suspended.
HyperEVM Sniper Bot’s endorsement is suspended . We could not reverify the prior 1% fee, dual-layer execution, or 150 ms latency claims from accessible primary documentation. Do not treat those earlier claims as established.
This September 28, 2026 review checks public sources for pricing, selected permission details, audit records, and service status. It establishes a correction baseline; it does not establish when each discrepancy began. HypeChain has not run new trading, withdrawal, or latency tests.
Compare documented costs
The table uses the same records as the individual profiles and interactive comparison. Rates are provider charges unless stated otherwise. Hyperliquid exchange fees, funding, gas, and slippage are separate where applicable. Check the amount and permissions shown before signing.
| Product | Provider fees and conditions | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom Bot | 1% standard fee; referral page describes 10% cashback claimable after the minimum (1 HYPE on HyperEVM), while the fee page labels 0.9% for referrals; execution-time treatment is unclear. 1% standard buy/sell fee; referral docs describe 10% cashback with claim thresholds, while a separate fee page labels 0.9% for referred trades; execution-time treatment is unclear. | Source checked 2026-09-28. Primary source Official fee, cashback, and wallet documentation checked; trading tests not run. |
| Gainium | Free User: 0.07% on USDC spot sells; 0.045% on both sides of USDC futures trades. Paid User: no builder fee; bot credits apply. Free User mode: 0.07% USDC spot sell builder fee and 0.045% on both sides of USDC futures trades; bots do not consume credits. Paid User mode: no builder fee, but bots consume plan credits. Hyperliquid trading fees are additional. | Source checked 2026-09-28. Primary source Official Hyperliquid fee modes and wallet connection docs checked; trading tests not run. |
| goodcryptoX Status information only; the provider announced a service end date. Current service status is unconfirmed and onboarding is suspended. | Historical: 0.1% perps / 1% spot sells builder fee before eligible discounts; Hyperliquid venue fees separate Historical builder-fee documentation rechecked October 3: 0.1% perps, 1% spot sells and 0% spot buys before eligible discounts. Hyperliquid venue fees are separate; no separate Hyperliquid subscription documented. | Source checked 2026-10-03. Primary source Wind-down notice, builder fees, API-wallet connection/storage docs and CertiK public record checked October 3. Account exit, trading, recovery and shutdown execution not tested. |
| Hyperbot Status information only; the provider announced a trading wind-down. Current service status is unconfirmed and onboarding is suspended. | Not applicable to new recommendations No new trading onboarding; consult the dated service-status notice for the provider's announced wind-down dates. | Source checked 2026-10-03. Primary source Official wind-down notice and Hyperliquid account, signer, order and balance documentation checked October 3; shutdown execution, account exit and analytics not tested. |
| HyperEVM Sniper Bot Not reverified: prior fee, dual-layer, 150 ms latency, and API-only permission claims are suspended pending accessible primary evidence. | Not reverified as of 2026-09-28; the previous 1% claim is withdrawn pending primary evidence. Not reverified; no accessible current primary fee schedule was found in the scoped check. | Source checked 2026-09-28. Accessible listed bot entrypoint and official-source search checked for fees, architecture, latency, and wallet permissions; current claims not reverified; trading tests not run. |
| Hypurr Fun Bot | 1% on trades through Hpump Market only; no rate established here for other markets. 1% on Hpump Market trades only; the Hpump fee page does not establish rates for HyperCore spot/perpetuals or HyperEVM spot. | Source checked 2026-09-28. Primary source Official Hpump fee and wallet-mode docs checked; trading tests not run. |
| Katoshi AI | Katoshi's published schedule: Wood 0.06% perps / 0.6% spot sells; Diamond >$25M volume: 0.01% / 0.1%. Hyperliquid venue fees are separately published. Wood entry tier: 0.06% perps / 0.6% spot sells. Diamond (> $25M rolling 30-day volume): 0.01% / 0.1%. Vault bots: 1 credit per bot per day; 1 credit costs 1 USDC, with 0% Katoshi perps fee per docs. | Source checked 2026-09-28. Primary source Official Katoshi fee tiers, spot-side treatment, and vault-credit terms, plus Hyperliquid venue-fee and builder-code rules; custody and trading tests not assessed. |
| WunderTrading | Vendor-published 0.035% builder fee per trade; combined in-app cost not tested. Hyperliquid publishes separate venue fees. Hyperliquid: 0.035% builder fee per trade, with Premium features and no separate subscription. WunderTrading calls it the only cost; combined display with Hyperliquid venue fees was not tested. | Source checked 2026-09-28. Primary source Official Hyperliquid bot, builder-fee, and API-wallet permission claims; trading tests and key-storage review not run. |
“No subscription” does not mean no trading fee. For example, a 0.1% builder fee on a $1,000 futures execution is $1; a separately charged $1,000 closing execution adds another $1. That arithmetic excludes exchange fees, funding, and slippage.
Katoshi’s lowest advertised tier is conditional: its documentation places 0.01% perps and 0.1% spot sells at Diamond, with more than $25 million of rolling 30-day volume. Entry-tier rates are 0.06% and 0.6%. The source’s intermediate Bronze and Silver thresholds appear out of order; confirm those tiers in the app rather than silently correcting the vendor’s table.
Bloom’s documented referral cashback is a later claimable benefit, not a universal reduction to the execution fee. Hypurr’s documented 1% rate applies to Hpump; it should not be extended to every market or wallet mode.
Permissions matter more than a custody badge
A delegated trading key can place losing trades even when it cannot withdraw. “Non-custodial” also does not establish that every key stays on your device.
goodcryptoX documents storing the delegated API-wallet private key in its service. Its integration describes trading permission without withdrawal permission. This is different from handing over a main-wallet private key, and it still creates operational and trading risk.
Hypurr Fun describes different wallet modes. Read the mode-specific explanation before inferring who controls keys. For each service, identify the signer, permitted actions, key storage, and exit procedure using the custody checklist .
What the goodcryptoX security record establishes
The public auditor record describes a pentest delivered October 8, 2024, with 11 findings: four resolved, six acknowledged, and one partially resolved. Major and medium findings are marked resolved; the remaining findings are minor. The profile links the report and scope .
Our former description of a 2025 audit with all findings remediated overstated that evidence. A historical pentest does not certify the current Hyperliquid integration or eliminate custody and trading risk. We have removed blanket low-risk labels and unsupported numeric rankings.
DXAP: a candidate to investigate
DXAP’s security page advertises a 0.025% charge on traded volume. Its documentation states no subscription and alpha access through referrals or a waitlist . Hyperliquid fees and funding are separate. These are vendor statements, not a tested recommendation. We have not verified live execution, key handling, or withdrawal behavior, so DXAP remains a candidate rather than a ranked listing.
Freshness and evidence limits
The prior guide displayed February 15 as its last full review and March 15 as its next scheduled review. Those dates did not support a fresh September endorsement. We have retired the old Tier 1 labels and automatic-sounding review promises. A source-check date records exactly what was read; it is not a renewed product test.
Our methodology distinguishes vendor documentation, auditor findings, and HypeChain tests. Use the interactive comparison for provider details and linked profiles for primary sources. Affiliate links may earn HypeChain a commission; that does not establish a service’s reliability or suitability.